<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sirius XM Receives More Upgrades After Historic Quarter, S &amp; P Credit Outlook Positive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kingofalltrades.com/2009/11/18/1263.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kingofalltrades.com/2009/11/18/1263.html</link>
	<description>An Online Community of Investors &#38; Financial Experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:51:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Superdave</title>
		<link>http://www.kingofalltrades.com/2009/11/18/1263.html/comment-page-1#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Superdave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingofalltrades.com/?p=263#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Its articles like this that gets suckers to buy the stock. here do you get your info? I get mine from SEC filings.
You stated
&quot;This came after Sirius XM reported break even earnings for the first time in its history.&quot;

This is utterly false.
Net loss attributable to common stockholders 
Q3=(149,190)
Q1 thru Q3=(543,145)

Both time periods were a loss IE this is not positive/break even earnings.

You also stated
&quot;Costs were controlled yet again, and revenue was up.&quot;
Q3 expenses for Q3 are actually up over last 2 quarters of 2009, but you can parse this one for arguments sake.

You also said
&quot;Refinancing existing loans in 2009 with better rates, due much later, and even used cash to remove debt.&quot;

You make it sound like they have cash and are paying things down. While the rate is lower than the 15%, it cost them $130 million +- to refi and the cash they used was cash obtained from cashign in on dilutung with more shares.

But I guess you are in so deep you are desparate to spin this as if SIRI is just doing dandy. 

PS The amount of debt they owed in Jan 2009 is now higher as of Nov 18, 2009.....nothing has changed, it&#039;s more of the same shell game.

good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its articles like this that gets suckers to buy the stock. here do you get your info? I get mine from SEC filings.<br />
You stated<br />
&#8220;This came after Sirius XM reported break even earnings for the first time in its history.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is utterly false.<br />
Net loss attributable to common stockholders<br />
Q3=(149,190)<br />
Q1 thru Q3=(543,145)</p>
<p>Both time periods were a loss IE this is not positive/break even earnings.</p>
<p>You also stated<br />
&#8220;Costs were controlled yet again, and revenue was up.&#8221;<br />
Q3 expenses for Q3 are actually up over last 2 quarters of 2009, but you can parse this one for arguments sake.</p>
<p>You also said<br />
&#8220;Refinancing existing loans in 2009 with better rates, due much later, and even used cash to remove debt.&#8221;</p>
<p>You make it sound like they have cash and are paying things down. While the rate is lower than the 15%, it cost them $130 million +- to refi and the cash they used was cash obtained from cashign in on dilutung with more shares.</p>
<p>But I guess you are in so deep you are desparate to spin this as if SIRI is just doing dandy. </p>
<p>PS The amount of debt they owed in Jan 2009 is now higher as of Nov 18, 2009&#8230;..nothing has changed, it&#8217;s more of the same shell game.</p>
<p>good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Zarlino</title>
		<link>http://www.kingofalltrades.com/2009/11/18/1263.html/comment-page-1#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>John Zarlino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingofalltrades.com/?p=263#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Corrected Spelling (AGAIN) YIKES!

I wish they (SIRIUS) would go on the pink sheets so the “big money” guys can’t play. Thank you SIRIUS for providing me a safe haven to park my son’s college education money. He is in thrid grade and I own a boat load today. Can you imagine what SIRIUS stock will be worth in nine years!

John Zarlino
Your Car Guy
jdzarlinoyourcarguy@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corrected Spelling (AGAIN) YIKES!</p>
<p>I wish they (SIRIUS) would go on the pink sheets so the “big money” guys can’t play. Thank you SIRIUS for providing me a safe haven to park my son’s college education money. He is in thrid grade and I own a boat load today. Can you imagine what SIRIUS stock will be worth in nine years!</p>
<p>John Zarlino<br />
Your Car Guy<br />
<a href="mailto:jdzarlinoyourcarguy@yahoo.com">jdzarlinoyourcarguy@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Barkett</title>
		<link>http://www.kingofalltrades.com/2009/11/18/1263.html/comment-page-1#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal Barkett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingofalltrades.com/?p=263#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Seems like the market is still skeptical &amp; holding its collective breath on Sirius Xm (great 3rd quarter report w/ not much stock price movement to reflect performance). With so much negative press it seems to be understandable. But on the flip side I would think that if Sirius Xm follows thru on what you are saying then they could be set to be headed for another huge stock price increase in 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like the market is still skeptical &amp; holding its collective breath on Sirius Xm (great 3rd quarter report w/ not much stock price movement to reflect performance). With so much negative press it seems to be understandable. But on the flip side I would think that if Sirius Xm follows thru on what you are saying then they could be set to be headed for another huge stock price increase in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
