Housing Markets Archive

3

Citigroup Attempts Improvements in Face of Mortgage Crisis

Share

Last month, Citigroup announced plans for a 10 for 1 reverse stock split, which will move the share price somewhere near $40 by reducing the number of outstanding shares from the current 29 billion to a much more reasonable number of 2.9 billion. Citigroup share price is down 92% from its 2006 high of $55.70 which was achieved with close to 5 billion shares outstanding. The reverse split will take effect May 6, Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit believes that the reverse split, together with with the reinstatement of a penny per share dividend as an initial step are important first moves as the company anticipates returning capital to shareholders starting next year. Citigroup has paid back the $45 billion it received from the government in 2008; it cannot pay quarterly dividends of more than 1 cent a share until 2012 as a condition of the rescue. Citigroups dividends to shareholders had been as high as .49 cents prior to the 2008 economic meltdown, and in 2008 the dividend was .16 cents before the collapse. The last dividend the company paid was .01 cent in February of 2009.

Citigroup (NYSE:C) has been in the midst of righting itself since its collapse. TARP money and government favors permitted it to survive. However, CEO Vikram Pandit has steadily marched the company back from the dead over the course of the past 2 years. While not all of his decisions have been well received the results so far have been better than anticipated.  The company has focused much of its energy in the past two years on cutting off parts of its businesses that don’t fit with its main banking operation.

Unfortunately there are also recent reports that Citigroup continues to struggle with its mortgage business; the bank is still selling mortgages that violate quality standards, according to an internal Freddie Mac (OTCBB:FMCC) review obtained by Bloomberg in January.  Fifteen percent of the loans Citigroup sold to the government owned mortgage finance company in the second half of 2009 and the first half of 2010 had such flaws as missing appraisals, insurance documents or income miscalculations, according to a review of 375 mortgages. The target for defects should be about 5 percent, said Tim Rood, a former executive with Freddie’s sister agency Fannie Mae, and now managing director at Washington-based advisory firm Collingwood Group LLC.  Citigroup faces $100 million in payouts on the loans if customers demand refunds for mortgages that stop paying, according to Paul J. Miller of FBR Capital Markets in Arlington, Virginia. Miller based his estimate on the numbers in the Freddie Mac memo.

Also of note, Citigroup Inc. will raise as much as $273 million selling a stake in insurer Primerica Inc (NYSE:PRI). Citigroup is offering 12 million shares at $22.75 each.  Underwriters have the option of purchasing an additional 1.8 million Primerica shares from Citigroup. The bank will still hold 20.7 to 23.1 percent of Primerica after the sale.  Citigroup was the largest shareholder as of December 2010 with a 40 percent stake, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Primerica was part of Citi Holdings, the portfolio of businesses Pandit said he would sell, wind down or restructure in order to get back to a more core business model. Primerica, based in Duluth, Georgia, sells term life insurance and mutual funds. It sold 21.36 million shares at $15 each as part of its initial public offering in March 2010. Primerica has declined 3.4 percent this year overall.

Disclosure: No position in C or PRI

2

Citigroup (NYSE:C) Remains a Solid if Unspectacular Choice

Share

 

Citigroup (NYSE:C) shares continue to be volatile.  Shares of Citigroup, which were trading at more than $55 per share in 2007 plummeted to less than $2 in 2009 and have begun to recover reaching more than 5 dollars in April.   Citigroup shares closed below 4 dollars in trading yesterday at $3.86 per share. Citigroup This is not an unexpected situation for informed investors; as the government owns more than one quarter of Citigroup, and has been unloading roughly 20% of their stake of approximately 7.7 billion shares in the company since late April.  The Treasury began selling its common shares under a prearranged plan with Morgan Stanley as the sales agent for the deal.  The initial sell off of shares amounts to roughly 1.5 billion shares. Citigroup stock should basically trade sideways to slightly lower while unwinding of this first lot is completed.  Once complete, the stock should move up as the company continues to unwind or sell off many of its toxic assets; on the path back to its core banking business as the fundamentals continue to improve.  It is important to remember that at some point the Fed will have to raise interest rates and banks like Citigroup will once again have to actually work at turning a profit, but over the long haul, this stock should bring solid gains to its holders.

Read the rest of this entry »

1

Citigroup (NYSE:C) Moves Forward by Moving Away from Weil’s Model

Share

citi

Citigroup (NYSE:C) announced yesterday that it is selling off its Hedge Fund Business to Skybridge Capital LLC. which specializes in startup hedge funds.  The business has been sitting in Citi Holdings, a recent implementation into the Citigroup structure with a number of other assets that Citigroup is trying to sell off or wind down due to the events of the recent financial crisis.  Many of these assets were part of the Sanford Weil acquisition strategy which was implemented in the late 1990’s at Citigroup and bloated the company.  This plan created too many limbs and different strategies which were impossible to grasp and manage over the years and did not help Charles Prince, who in all honesty was not qualified to run such a huge financial conglomerate, never mind a bank. The deal was being talked about since February but seems to be entering final stages.  No actual terms were released.

This is a perfect example of what Citigroup needs to do to reposition itself and strengthen itself as a bank first and foremost again. It is also a far cry from recent testimony at banking related hearings from Charles Prince and others.  The assets which the company determined as not part of the company plan have all been sitting in the Citi Holdings side of the house, awaiting buyers or liquidation.  As the company continues to shed these riskier assets and moves back towards the core banking business it first started out being, investors and customers will begin to see the benefits and financial rewards of the newly re worked and streamlined entity.  In effect, Citigroup is returning to its roots; not a moment too soon and a long overdue decision in my opinion.  CEO Vikram Pandit and future  management will have more transparency and a better stronger management team as a result.

The market seems to be welcoming this news with open arms, and for good reason.  Citigroup appears determined to reverse the issues that bogged it down and nearly sent it to a similar fate as Lehman Brothers.  Citigroup coming back off the mat should be viewed as a good thing, however, shareholders need to stay on top of the situation with all the different situations taking place, from raising cash through new bond offerings for general corporate purposes to new IPOs (Primerica) (NYSE:PRI) in efforts to divest itself of some under performing or non essential assets which came with the merger that occurred through Weil, knowing what is currently going on can lead to some solid profits in this equity.  Primerica (PRI) is up since its initial public offering price of 15 dollars and is trading near the 26 dollar level.  Alas Primerica has apparently gone full circle; and Citigroup intends to totally divest itself of Primerica moving forward.  Continued cautious optimism is advised, as Citigroup continues to return closer to its roots with US Government backing and support as well as continued growth  abroad with obviously improved confidence domestically among retail and institutional shareholders.

Disclosure: Currently no position in C or PRI

46

Citigroup (NYSE:C) Still on a Perilous Slope with Recent Revelations

Share

Citigroup

 

As we watch Citigroup (NYSE:C) continue to trade above 4.20 a share, I have to ask investors what they are driving this stock price up on?  Certainly with the recent news that the government would like to divest itself of its shares, the price per share of this equity theoretically should drop.  Also amid all the recent speculation, we are seeing bits and pieces of a massive fraud and lack of competence among the Mortgage and Banking industries with Citigroup smack dab in the middle of it all.

Recent information from a former executive with Citigroup suggests management ignored an internal warning that most of the mortgages it was selling were defective.  This former executive testified to this on Wednesday.  Other former executives at Citigroup and New Century Financial told the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission on Wednesday how their firms contributed to the creation and selling of subprime mortgages and mortgage backed securities that created and sustained the housing bubble prior to its implosion.  Among the testimony were revelations that exposed some very serious allegations.  One of which was Richard Bowen, who was business chief underwriter during his time at Citigroup, testifying that he warned executive committee chairman Robert Rubin about the destructive business practices occurring in the company’s mortgage arm.  Bowen also stated he discovered in 2006 that “60 percent of the mortgages bought and resold by the company were defective,” meaning they were not up to Citigroup minimum standards or guidelines.  When asked how Rubin responded, Bowen replied, “I received a very brief phone call from a general counsel within the company.  He said they were doing background research and didn’t need to talk to me.”  Astonishing revelation  if true and very revealing of the extent of corporate greed at Citigroup at the time.

Read the rest of this entry »

7

Understanding the Market Boom/Bust Cycle (NYSE:IBM, NYSE:BAC, NYSE:C)

Share

By Relmor Demitrius -

The year 2008 proved to be a very educational one for the average investor.  Due to the stock market downtrend, bank failures, and emergency FED meetings galore, we learned some interesting diction during this economic downturn.  Stagflation, inflation, deflation, recession, depression, V shaped corrections, W shaped corrections, FED rates, LIBOR rates, and what the hell is a CDO?  What is the boom/bust cycle?  What are cyclical stocks?  Value stocks?  All these concepts and words were being thrown around by so called “experts” on every news TV show to every financial bog and newspaper in the country.  The amount of half truths, misinformation, and just plain fear mongering was staggering.  I think as time has passed, and a clear mind can now be used to refocus on some of these past events, terms, and concepts.  We can use this to better understand where to put your money a year from now, or even tomorrow.  But first, you have to understand the animal.

At the core of all of this is having a basic understanding of the economic and monetary rules that are applicable to today’s world.  At the very core, the first concept that must be understood is what is fiat currency, the current monetary system we are using today.

Fiat currency is a currency that is backed by nothing, and measurable only to other currencies.  This is where the term “floating currency” comes from, which means it is only “floating” in apparent value up or down in comparison to other currencies currently backed by nothing.  The Euro, Yuan, Ruble, and most major foreign currencies are indeed backed by nothing but a promise.  In effect they are not assets, they are simply a way to pay debt.  Since we live in a world of debt, they should always have a use, however.  In 1941, with the creation of the Taft-Hartley Act, which Nixon revoked, we were on a limited gold standard.  When the U.S. dollar was implemented as the worlds reserve currency, we promised that an exchange for gold would always be possible.  Well in August of 1971, Nixon said, No more.  The dollar can no longer be redeemed for gold.  Costly war expenses, innovations in modern banking, and other factors lead to a huge influx in the money supply.  There soon simply wasn’t going to be enough gold to give out, if so demanded.

Read the rest of this entry »