Greg Maffei Archive

4

Mel Karmazin and Greg Maffei Add Flavor to Sirius XM’s Future

Share

By Relmor Demitrius

 

     Yesterday CITI had a Global Entertainment and Media Conference, in which Mel Karmazin, CEO of Sirius XM Radio (NASDAQ:SIRI) and Greg Maffei, CEO of Liberty Media (NASDAQ:LINTA) spoke. There was no formal presentations by these gentleman but they were on board for answering some really good questions. This conference helped answer some important questions investors had about the company. Greg and Mel were very frank and offered valuable information investors can use to make better decisions about their investment with the company. First let us look at what Mel had to say. The first thing Mel offered was information on Q4 subscriber totals.

Mel stated that in Q4, Sirius XM added a net 540,000 additional subscribers. This beat yearly guidance by 100,000 subscribers. A decent beat but nothing to write home about. The great thing here is that Mel can once again be trusted, and when he upped subscriber guidance in 2011, it was to be accurate, and was surely no bullish pump. I know there were many media types that doubted the 1.6 million mark could be reached due to Japanese supply delays, production delays, and a higher churn base. However, these issues were overblown obviously and Sirius XM hit their mark and some. This is great news for investors and people looking for a reason to get in. Another issue with Mel not lying since the merger, is that he promised 2 radios for 2.0 in 2011 and delivered, by releasing the Lynx Hybrid Radio, for satellite use and internet, home or car.

This android based radio provides new features and functionalities, with an endless ability to upgrade its functionality and content. With new compressed bandwidth this radio opens up another avenue of content non 2.0 radios cannot receive. The biggest surprise on functionality came in another promise Mel made.

This news came during the CITI conference. Mel stated that “personalized radio”, like Pandora features, would be coming to their internet and smart phone services “probably this year”. He stated that it’s not a big deal for the company and wouldn’t be another business model, just another feature for retention. He stated if there are customers out there who would turn away from the product because they didn’t have this functionality, then Sirius XM was going to offer it to them. Basically Sirius XM can now evolve their radio experience to the demand of the consumer. The way he presented it was not like it was going to be a big revenue generator and basically implied it’s so easy to add, that the originality of the Pandora type service is easily reproduced. Pandora already has no uniqueness to begin with, as they compete with services like Slacker anyway. But I get what Mel is doing here. If this is an excuse by some, or even a perception that a service is demanded they cannot provide, then they will show you how easy it is to provide, and offer it at NO COST to exisitng subscribers. Free. Here you go subs. You wanted this cute random music generator tailored to your taste, here you go. Enjoy. Now Sirius XM 2.0 will have all the features everyone wanted and complained about. Let the new wave of bashing begin now. Maybe in a future article, since bears are running out of ideas, I can suggest some topics for them. Remember, on demand features have been mentioned and are coming as well. I expect some type of synergy down the road with Live Nation on this end. On Demand live concert events is one thought. Pay per listen. This would be yet another revenue stream. Maybe buying concert tickets from your radio too. Who knows.

Another topic broached was the new structure of the GM contract. The questioner wanted flavor on the details of the agreement. Mel stated he couldn’t say much, but he did offer some great insight we never knew before. He stated when they re-did the GM contract in 2009, there was an immediate impact. In fact, KOAT wrote an article at that time showing you from the filing directly how much was saved. So this is not new news to KOAT supporters. We have been gaining an advantage from the new structured GM deal since 2009. But as Mel explained it was 3 phase deal. More benefit comes to Sirius XM in 2013 and even more in the final phase in 2014. He stated the deal offers a “fairer return” that has “more appropriate value” for Sirius XM. He went over the philosophy of why the first GM deal was so advantageous for GM. Obviously to get your foot in the door it took some incentives. Now GM doesn’t want to be the only car maker without satellite radio in it. The new OEM deals will be, as Mel stated, “market value”. Meaning only one competing company now, based on real fundamentals that are mutually beneficial to both parties. XM never made $1 on the GM deal before the merger. All the benefit went to GM. Well in 2009 that changed, and in 2013 and 2014 coming it will become more like all the deals will be structured in the future. So synergies haven’t even barely begun on this aspect. Mel also mentioned another synergy investors can look forward too in the future.

Mel stated that cars have around a 10 to 14 year cycle. So when Sirius XM installed legacy radios that only can receive one signal, they are obligated to support that radio till it the car’s life is over. So if you begin installing 2.0 in 2013, you can guess the time frame it will take to phase out these old radios. Non 2.0 radios will never be sold again, at least not for Sirius’s signal. Sirius will not put out a new radio just for Sirius again, in my opinion. Although I don’t think that observation is a stretch. We know Sirius XM is trying to go to one platform and now we have Mel’s confirmation of that. He said by around 2020 you can expect the phasing to be near complete into all radios that can receive both signals. At that point the Sirius platform would be suspended and no new satellites will be launched that only send Sirius’s signal. That frees up half their bandwidth. Mel stated they can use it for different business model, more channels, or whatever they want. This is a huge synergy and one of the reasons the merger was so valueable. Now we have a time frame on all of this. What intrigued me the most as an investor is when he said “use it for a different business model”. That is another future revenue stream not priced into the stock one bit.

Mel also talked about how their margins are growing wider than first anticipated. They had modelled 30 to 35%, but now Mel is promising a 40% margin company in the near future. That is an amazing model for any business. I doubt oil companies even enjoy a margin like that. So basically if they earn 10 billion in revenue, there cash intake would be 4 billion dollars. That’s not earnings, its cash.

Earlier in the article Mel stated that subscribers grew by 540,000. He stated that at this time, the used car market is now adding “significant numbers” to the totals. This is the first time Mel has used the word significant here and judging by the Q4 adds, it is apparent it is finally making a difference. With recently adding the Auto Nation deal and already having the Car Max and all used cars sold by GM dealers in play, their base to catch the used car market is rapidly expanding. Since they convert these subs at a 35% or higher clip and these subs go directly to the self pay subscriber totals never being a paid promo, this will help grow their subscriber base substantially now into the future. Now let’s go over briefly what Greg Maffei had to say at the conference.

He stated that it was a very bad idea to “add the last shares” to gain control. This is not something they are necessarily looking to do. Gaining control of Sirius XM is not on the table apparently. He also stated anything they did in adding or whatever, would be something the board (Basically both sides) would agree too. There will be no hostile takeover or tender directly to shareholders basically. If the board agrees to something, they will explore that avenue. This is good news to investors. This means that both sides are finding some common ground and a common plan to benefit both sides, as I expected would be the case. Once again Maffei reiterated that the March date has little meaning to them.

Maffei also crushed the irresponsible and wrong argument perpetuated by the media rhetorics that the NOL’s are an attractive and motivational reason to acquire a controlling interest. He stated this answer once again, and appears bothered by the same dumb questions, that Sirius XM will use their own NOL’s. This has been a clear and consistant issue at KOAT since 2009. The only confusion on this issue has come from ignorant media types that take one bad piece of information and try to fabricate a story out of it. Sorry folks, no story here on that issue. Liberty is not sitting in a room plotting ways to destroy Sirius XM and their value. Hate to rain on your parade but the two sides appear lining up to agree on something here in 2012. It will be either how a return of preferred to Sirius XM would work, a buyback, or some type of mutually beneficial agreement to both sides. Of course the most logical thing is Liberty does nothing, holds at 40% and as stated by Liberty, “rides the growth path of Sirius XM”. So Liberty is not going to throw good money after free to gain control simply to do it. There would have to be a reason too. Maffei said it is too expensive to gain control at this point. Well when your first 40% is free, I can see their thinking on that.

He did state that if Liberty did take control, they WOULD NOT TENDER FOR THE COMPANY. They are NOT INTERESTED IN TOTAL 100% OWNERSHIP. There. Done, next. I am personally tired of this rumor myself. This one had made the very least sense. Basically if Liberty added it would be to around 50 to 60% and only if they felt the direction of the company was in danger. Of course this agreement to go to these levels could come as a concession on a number of issues, including how a buyback would work, restrictions on the preferred shares, or other give and takes. I also wouldn’t be surprised to learn that the fraud lawsuit currently going against Malone and the Sirius XM Board has taken some of the greed and bite out of Malone’s stances on working with Sirius XM on a mutually beneficial future plan. 2012 board decisions should be interesting so stay tuned.

As you can see by this conference that the company is strong and improving the cost and revenue side of the business. Mel has delivered a new radio that can evolve with demand and Liberty is set to ride the growth of Sirius XM Radio. 2012 should be full of new developments.

 

Disclosure: Long SIRI

4

Look You Dumb Journalists, Liberty Is Not Acquiring Sirius XM, They Already Own It

Share

By Relmor Demitrius

 

    For the life of me I can’t understand why “journalists”, and I use that term extremely loosely here when considering the coverage of Sirius XM Radio (NASDAQ:SIRI), cannot understand simple math and simple facts. If I hear the NOL’s mentioned one more time as why Liberty would take over Sirius XM, I’m going to scream and throw something. NOL’s are 100% for Sirius XM to use, will be used 100% by Sirius XM, and has no value directly to Liberty. This is from comments from Frear (CFO of Sirius XM), Mel Karamazin (CEO of Sirius XM), and Greg Maffei (CEO of LCAPA).  There is NO SCENARIO PERIOD that allows Liberty to benefit from them except as an indirect 40% stakeholder in Sirius. It gives their holding more value, as profits are protected till around 2020. That’s it. That is the only benefit to the company and Liberty. LCAPA can’t spin off, spit off, crunch off, roll off, spit off, or any other form of off to make them any other way. So stop it. Stop it right now. Stop your incessant babbling and learn how to understand simple concepts. And they are not valued at 8 billion, its more, and its around 3 billion in cash value. NOT 8!!! There is no magic way to add 8 billion to the asset line. It comes in small chunks as savings on profits that would have been paid to IRS.

Another simple concept running out there that cannt seemingly be made clear is that Liberty doesn’t already control the company direction. As a 40% preffered stockholder with veto rights on major cash usage, they already control the company. They paid zero dollars for their stake and would be foolish to throw good money into it just to acquire a controlling stake. Reason they didn’t offer 50% in the first place. Reason prices .05 cents to $2.44 were ignored by Liberty to add to 49% , which they could have from day 1. Greg Maffei said it himself, stupids. Why would we acquire shares now, when we ignored them for so long? Exactly Greg. Common sense is in order.

Another stupid theory is that Liberty will tender for 100% of the company and take it private. Unbelieveable, unprecedented in how Liberty handles their assets, and also very stupid. Take on 100% of the risk versus 40% ownership with no risk? Who’s that stupid? Why pay another 8 billion dollars to buy out the company? You realize how long it would take them to cash out 8 billion dollars in Sirius XM with their current cash intake minus debt? Around 10 years at current levels. Or Liberty can stay 100% in profit range for 100% of the entire time they hold the company. What would you do?  Keep in mind Liberty owns 100% of very little.

Sure, Liberty could acquire a 10% stake if they don’t like how the board room is working out for their vision, but they are a hands off owner, so that is the least likely scenario out there. If they acquire a 60% stake you wouldn’t have to sell your shares, they would still trade and would be more valueable as more shares are out of the float. Tired of stupid authors not seeing this, mentioning this, or seeing the scenario it would require to produce this result.

Another stupid theory running around right now is that Sirius XM will miss their Q4 sub guidance. Obviously these people don’t know about production subs, the used car market success, or failed to become aware of declining losses in the retail side of the metric. Either way, they can’t do simple math. OEM adds for Q4 2011 will be around 600,000 minimum. Thats minimum. Now subtract maybe 100,000 retail side loss (typical every quarter) and you have your 500,000 subscriber addition quarter. Mel also stated they will meet guidance last time he talked. So saying a miss is coming makes for good clicks, but it doesn’t help you as an investor when an “expert” misses a simple math problem. Don’t forget, used car promo subs were never counted as a promo sub, hence will appear like magic directly to the self pay subscriber totals. These authors also fail to mention this fact.

Sirius XM buying Pandora is probably the funniest thing I have read lately. Talk about desperation as a Pandora stockholder. No, no one is going to buy your company. Sorry. You have no assets, hence nothing to value. I don’t see any acquisition out their more valueable right now that a buyback would offer. Mel stated a buyback is coming, so don’t expect it not too. It would be stupid. Would Liberty hinder company growth or appeciation of their stock holding? No, that would be “stupid”.

 

Disclosure: Long SIRI

2

Liberty Media Has No Plans To Add Stake in Sirius XM

Share

 By Relmor Demitrius

 

  Sorry get rich quickers. Liberty is not going to be making a large tender offer for the entire company anytime soon.  This was reported comments made at a Reuters Media Conference this week from Mel Karmazin.  Irresponsible journalism is running rampant again on issues we have been discussing for years now. According to Reuters, Sirius XM (NASDAQ:SIRI) CEO Mel Karmazin stated that no offer has come and he doesn’t expect it too.

When Greg Maffei (CEO of Liberty Capital) was asked recently if they would ever be selling their stake in Sirius XM, he laughed. We know this because it’s a 4 billion dollar leveraged asset they received for free. According to their latest slides discussing their holding in Sirius XM, they stated they are “Riding the Growth Path” of Sirius XM. Since logic dictates that when you get 40% of something for nothing, you don’t add money to get another 10% or 20% simply for more control, when you are already basically in control of big money issues such as debt, acquisitions, and large uses of cash. They also have a strong board presence as well. Liberty has stated many times they like Mel in control, they like management, and they are doing an excellent job. So if they don’t need control of day to day operations, they won’t take it unless absolutely necessary. Now if Sirius XM was in trouble, their management incompetent, that would be another story entirely. Mel Karmazin basically yesterday squelched the silly and obviously wrong report by the NY Post stating Mel and Malone were in talks for Liberty to “add” more stake in the company. This is illogical to begin with because Sirius XM is not for sale. Mel would not be willing to sell anymore to Liberty. If they want more control they will offer a tender and that wouldn’t be something they would need the board to discuss. Hence the report is more than likely wrong. If anything they are in talks on how to work a stock buyback, something Malone has a history of doing with a majority of his major holdings in Liberty Media.

As the stock is ripe to repurchase at these levels, that is the more likely scenario, to be announced sometime in 2012. 2012 has been the year Mel Karmazin has stated will be the year the board makes a decision on how they will return capital to shareholders. Expect something after March, when Liberty is fully capable of adding if they would like. Mel wants clarity on the Liberty situation and is probably in the process of getting that now. All comments from Mel is postering at this point and should be taken with a grain of salt, also considering that his contract is coming due once again at the end of 2012.

We know Mel Karmazin is only interested in running Sirius XM as the #1 guy, and that doesn’t appear to have changed. All of Mel’s stated comments in the Reuters article have been said before by him, at other times in the past. There was nothing new in the article. Sorry all you get rich quick traders out there, but your going to have to buy and hold this one for a while. There is no magic jump coming that can be timed on a news event. You can think March is important to Liberty, but in reality it is more important for management and Mel Karmazin than to us. Even if Liberty did add in a tender, they wouldn’t tender for all, and you wouldn’t have to sell. You would also see the stock trade right to that price instantly. Since the shares would be bought by Liberty they would effectively be removed from the float.

The other way is that Liberty agrees to a buyback and the stock appreciates that way. Either way, Liberty has no master plan to screw the Sirius XM stockholder and only wants what is best for the company. As 40% owners, wouldn’t you? In the end, logic is always the way to go with these things, not wild rumors from the mass media.

Disclosure: Long SIRI

0

Sirius XM 2nd Quarter Conference Call Proves Synergies Still Strong and Growing

Share

By Relmor Demitrius

Sirius XM 2nd Quarter Conference Call Proves Synergies     Recently I was struck aghast by a journalist commenting that Sirius XM (NASDAQ:SIRI) synergies were “baked in” and mostly over.   I responded with an article noting expected synergies from the company and what time frame they were expected in.  That article was written a few weeks ago and can be found here, http://www.kingofalltrades.com/2011/07/24/sirius-xm-major-synergies-finally-being-realized/.  On August 2nd, during Sirius XM’s conference call and subsequent 10Q filing, I was able to also find newer support that they are indeed still growing and being realized every quarter.

During the conference call Mel Karmazin, CEO of Sirius XM, stated that cost saving synergies are still “growing.”  This is good to hear if not expected, and a nice reiteration of what was known from 2008 and 2009.  In 2009 Mel Karmazin, David Frear, and Greg Maffei (CEO of Liberty Capital (NASDAQ:LCAPA)) all stated that Sirius XM’s major synergies were still down the road and growing.  All were excited about the coming cost savings from content contracts, OEM deal reworks, satellite network savings, and combining to one platform.  Now from the latest filing we find this synergy language when analyzing certain cost line items.  This is directly from the current 10 Q report.

“Three Months: For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, programming and content expenses were $67,399 and $72,019, respectively, a decrease of 6%, or $4,620, and decreased as a percentage of total revenue. The decrease was primarily due to savings in content agreements, production costs and general operating costs, partially offset by increases in personnel costs and a $1,915 reduction in the benefit to earnings from purchase price accounting adjustments associated with the Merger attributable to the amortization of the deferred credit on acquired programming executory contracts.”

For purposes of this article, the bolded comment is what is relevant.  Sirius XM usually, if not always, list the first reason as the biggest factor.  So right there in the official language of the document filed by law.  Sirius XM is crediting merger synergies with why costs on programming and content are still dropping.

“Three Months : For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, satellite and transmission expenses were $18,998 and $19,982, respectively, a decrease of 5%, or $984, and decreased as a percentage of total revenue. The decrease was primarily due to savings in repeater expenses and personnel costs.”

One of the expected savings was in capital expenditures to upkeep and improve the repeater network.  Here is proof of that still being realized.

“Three Months : For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, subscriber acquisition costs were $105,162 and $110,383, respectively, a decrease of 5%, or $5,221, and decreased as a percentage of total revenue. The decrease was primarily a result of improved OEM subsidy rates per vehicle and a $1,510 increase in the benefit to earnings from the amortization of the deferred credit for acquired executory contracts recognized in purchase price accounting associated with the Merger, partially offset by the 8% increase in gross subscriber additions.”

More OEM subsidy savings noted here on subscriber acquisition costs.  This is one of the company’s largest cost line items as well.

“Three Months : For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, SAC, per gross subscriber addition was $54 and $59, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to an 8% increase in gross subscribers and lower per radio subsidy rates for certain OEMs.”

This is once again noting the SAC dropping due to more efficient cost saving measures in OEM deals.

As you can see, the company is still experiencing strong synergy savings to this day and will realize it even more “down the road.”  It’s not until 2017 that the major satellite construction synergies being saving the company 1 billion dollars in expected launch costs saved by merging the satellite technologies.

Disclosure:  Long SIRI

1

Sirius XM Major Synergies Finally Being Realized

Sirius XM Radio (NASDAQ:SIRI) was never intended to be two separate companies upon its creation. The inventor, Martin Rothblatt, envisioned only one service that would be capable of financial survival.  Over 15 years later, he was proven correct.  The service was too new and the platforms too similar to differentiate themselves. It is possible the FCC's design in awarding two separate licenses was to weaken the technology revolution brought forth by satellite radio.  We know that much of what transpired had the constant backing and lobbying by the NAB lobbyists, and it worked as intended. In February of 2009, with a debt tower looming and a frozen bond market, Sirius XM Radio was forced to sell 40% of the company just to survive.  The company desperately needed the synergies a merger would provide.

By Relmor Demitrius -

Sirius XM Radio (NASDAQ:SIRI) was never intended to be two separate companies upon its creation. The inventor, Martin Rothblatt, envisioned only one service that would be capable of financial survival.  Over 15 years later, he was proven correct.  The service was too new and the platforms too similar to differentiate themselves. It is possible the FCC’s design in awarding two separate licenses was to weaken the technology revolution brought forth by satellite radio.  We know that much of what transpired had the constant backing by the NAB lobbyists, and it worked as intended. In February of 2009, with a debt tower looming and a frozen bond market, Sirius XM Radio was forced to sell 40% of the company just to survive.  The company desperately needed the synergies a merger would provide.

The government took over 1 year longer to approve this merger than it did to approve the Exxon-Mobile merger, which allowed a further consolidation of the world’s most crucial commodity.  That simple fact underlines the hypocrisy.  Another fact: both companies were making billions in profits at the time, yet both satellite radio companies were forced to the brink of insolvency, all due to an FCC decision made over a decade prior.  The sheer disbelief that it took that long to reach a decision about two poor discretionary income based services trying to survive is mind boggling.  Mel Karmazin (CEO of Sirius XM) didn’t create these horrific situations the company was thrown into, but he did, as any other business leader would, whatever it took to get them through it.  He was successful.

Today Sirius XM investors are beginning to reap the rewards of patience and belief in a business model they knew would and could be successful.  Surely now its opponents would admit defeat and move on?  With quarter after quarter of rising EBITDA, free cash flow, revenue, and increasing subscriber base, the media, analysts, and the shorts have been wrong about the company since 2009.  The synergies of the model are significant post-merger, with most analysts agreeing that the overall cost savings is actually in the billions.  In just about 10 years time, 6 billion in synergies was estimated possible as analysts pieced together the math.  Just where are we in this timeline of synergies being realized you asked?  Not a bad question, let’s take a look and find out.

First we must understand what the synergies were and how much has been realized up to now.  2009 is easy.  Mel Karmazin in late 2008 told investors exactly what the company was expecting in synergies for 2009. 400 million was the amount given. By the end of December of that year Frear stated it was actually closer to 500 million. So that leaves from 2010 on, still 5.5 billion in conservatively estimated synergies. I actually see this as higher personally, but we will use a low ball figure for purposes of this article.

Most synergies in 2009 came in the form of improved costs on administration line items, such as customer service and other general expenses. They closed the offices of XM Radio, laid off around 2,000 workers, combined call centers, and reduced some channel redundancies now that the companies had combined. This is the majority of that 400 million.

Most synergies according to Greg Maffei (CEO of Liberty Capital (NASDAQ:LCAPA)) and David Frear (CFO of Sirius XM Radio), were from consolidation of spectrum to one signal, renewal of OEM contracts and content contracts, and the synergies of 1 satellite array and 1 service. Almost none of these major synergies has happened to date. GM contract was redone, but other OEM deals are still in play from when XM and Sirius were competing for the same dash boards. Car makers are a valued business partner and Sirius XM generates hundreds of millions of dollars a year for its automakers. Pandora, etc… offer nothing back. Simply a nice little internet addition to appease those who want internet access. Sirius XM still owns the dashboard. Over 60% (could be higher but this is where Sirius XM wants it) have Sirius XM Radio’s installed. 45% of those people will pay for it after it expires. Extremely impressive and a model that is the envy of every company in the world that has something to sell automakers. To get any product in a dash and have it take with a 45% success rate is mind-bogglingly successful for a pay service. I will go on record right now as saying if it were free, it would be 99.99%. If it was $2 bucks it would be probably 90%. The price of the product is where you find the percentage of takers. Same with cable tv when it first started. Only the more wealthy purchased it or those who cared more about good entertainment. Maybe they couldn’t afford it as much as the next guy, but by golly they weren’t going to miss another sports event. Just like Sirius XM customers are beginning to realize. The product is so good, where those who traditionally wouldn’t pay for radio, but in this case, after the trial ended, felt could no longer go back to commercial terrestrial radio.

So let us now analyze the future synergies to come.

1. Content contract renewals. First major synergy was re-signing Howard Stern for reportingly less than his original contract. Since Howard Stern can not leverage XM this time to get more money out of Sirius XM, Sirius XM probably saved money. Opie and Anthony reportedly received either less or the same money as well. With more and more content contracts coming due, more savings are expected.

2. OEM contracts to be redone. Chrysler and Ford contracts are two that should provide similar savings that the GM contract provided. Since the company will not share the details of these contracts, we must use what information we have. Here is from an article I wrote when this deal was announced.

I have listed wording from the filing itself.

“”We entered into an agreement with General Motors to extend the term of XM’s distribution agreement to 2020, to improve the economic terms of the arrangement….” From Q1 2009 10-Q.

We should see some noticeable benefit from this deal by now. If we compare percentage of GM revenue and royalty sharing costs to their overall revenue percentage, we can see if any improvements are being made. Going with percentages removes fluctuations in total revenue, and we will assume steady GM sales throughout. There will be of course some degree of error as GM sales are not static. But compared to overall percentage of cars sold by all brands, the difference should be negligible. In Q1 of 2009 before the GM contract was reworked, 2.9% of total revenue went to pay GM revenue sharing agreements. In Q2 of 2009 it dropped to 2.2% of total revenue. In Q3 of 2009 it was 2.3% of total revenue. In Q4 of 2009 it was 1.8% of total revenue. In Q1 of 2010 it was only 1.3% of total revenue.”

Some may argue that this doesn’t prove anything. I disagree. Q1 2010 to Q1 2009 sub totals were extremely similar and GM market share is usually extremely consistent with other automakers. So in this case, it is useful information. In Sirius XM’s own words they agree this is a synergy realized. Here is a comment from Frear from December 2009.

Frear stated that the new GM contract had “significant savings” over the old contract. The words “significant savings” was a direct quote. So if one OEM contract rework provides “significant savings”, what would all of them provide? Obviously a not realized synergy yet. Here is more of what Frear stated that day in December of 2009. This is from an article I wrote on that UBS conference.

“David Frear mentioned that the huge savings of the merger have not even been realized yet, and still the company has realized over 500 million dollars in synergies from the merger already. The huge savings, as stated by Frear, will come as each and EVERY new contract that comes due, whether it is an OEM deal, talent, or even simple supplier contracts, Sirius XM will gain an advantage over the previous contract.” Gain an advantage over the previous contract. So obviously these synergies are just being realized as well.

3. Combining into one platform and 1 service is “down the road” for the companies as well, as stated by Maffei. This is an ongoing process, with its early stages already being seen. Improved internet service, channel reductions and efficiencies are just one small step to this evolution. Sirius 2.0, which should include interoperable capabilities, is another step in this process. Once this is completed, this would free up bandwidth for other services, a sale, a leasing agreement for data services, or synergies with DISH (NASDAQ:DISH) or DirecTV (NASDAQ:DTV), as both companies have Sirius XM Board exposure now. A coincidence? Hardly. Maffei has stated this is an unrealized synergy that is “down the road”.

4. Combining into one satellite array. Since now Sirius XM will use 3 satellites instead of 6, that will save the company 1 billion dollars approximately alone, starting in 2017. Until then Sirius XM will enjoy no capex costs associated with satellite launches. As I have shown by comments from the company and facts of their filings and stated goals, the synergies of Sirius XM are just now becoming significant and will grow going forward.

Here is a direct quote from Mel Karmazin to leave you with. “We expect to realize $400 million in synergies next year and see this figure growing substantially beyond 2009.”

Growing. Not finished.

Disclosure: Long SIRI

For investor comments on all stocks and trades, please visit www.kingofalltrades.com/community