satellite radio Archive

4

Look You Dumb Journalists, Liberty Is Not Acquiring Sirius XM, They Already Own It

Share

By Relmor Demitrius

 

    For the life of me I can’t understand why “journalists”, and I use that term extremely loosely here when considering the coverage of Sirius XM Radio (NASDAQ:SIRI), cannot understand simple math and simple facts. If I hear the NOL’s mentioned one more time as why Liberty would take over Sirius XM, I’m going to scream and throw something. NOL’s are 100% for Sirius XM to use, will be used 100% by Sirius XM, and has no value directly to Liberty. This is from comments from Frear (CFO of Sirius XM), Mel Karamazin (CEO of Sirius XM), and Greg Maffei (CEO of LCAPA).  There is NO SCENARIO PERIOD that allows Liberty to benefit from them except as an indirect 40% stakeholder in Sirius. It gives their holding more value, as profits are protected till around 2020. That’s it. That is the only benefit to the company and Liberty. LCAPA can’t spin off, spit off, crunch off, roll off, spit off, or any other form of off to make them any other way. So stop it. Stop it right now. Stop your incessant babbling and learn how to understand simple concepts. And they are not valued at 8 billion, its more, and its around 3 billion in cash value. NOT 8!!! There is no magic way to add 8 billion to the asset line. It comes in small chunks as savings on profits that would have been paid to IRS.

Another simple concept running out there that cannt seemingly be made clear is that Liberty doesn’t already control the company direction. As a 40% preffered stockholder with veto rights on major cash usage, they already control the company. They paid zero dollars for their stake and would be foolish to throw good money into it just to acquire a controlling stake. Reason they didn’t offer 50% in the first place. Reason prices .05 cents to $2.44 were ignored by Liberty to add to 49% , which they could have from day 1. Greg Maffei said it himself, stupids. Why would we acquire shares now, when we ignored them for so long? Exactly Greg. Common sense is in order.

Another stupid theory is that Liberty will tender for 100% of the company and take it private. Unbelieveable, unprecedented in how Liberty handles their assets, and also very stupid. Take on 100% of the risk versus 40% ownership with no risk? Who’s that stupid? Why pay another 8 billion dollars to buy out the company? You realize how long it would take them to cash out 8 billion dollars in Sirius XM with their current cash intake minus debt? Around 10 years at current levels. Or Liberty can stay 100% in profit range for 100% of the entire time they hold the company. What would you do?  Keep in mind Liberty owns 100% of very little.

Sure, Liberty could acquire a 10% stake if they don’t like how the board room is working out for their vision, but they are a hands off owner, so that is the least likely scenario out there. If they acquire a 60% stake you wouldn’t have to sell your shares, they would still trade and would be more valueable as more shares are out of the float. Tired of stupid authors not seeing this, mentioning this, or seeing the scenario it would require to produce this result.

Another stupid theory running around right now is that Sirius XM will miss their Q4 sub guidance. Obviously these people don’t know about production subs, the used car market success, or failed to become aware of declining losses in the retail side of the metric. Either way, they can’t do simple math. OEM adds for Q4 2011 will be around 600,000 minimum. Thats minimum. Now subtract maybe 100,000 retail side loss (typical every quarter) and you have your 500,000 subscriber addition quarter. Mel also stated they will meet guidance last time he talked. So saying a miss is coming makes for good clicks, but it doesn’t help you as an investor when an “expert” misses a simple math problem. Don’t forget, used car promo subs were never counted as a promo sub, hence will appear like magic directly to the self pay subscriber totals. These authors also fail to mention this fact.

Sirius XM buying Pandora is probably the funniest thing I have read lately. Talk about desperation as a Pandora stockholder. No, no one is going to buy your company. Sorry. You have no assets, hence nothing to value. I don’t see any acquisition out their more valueable right now that a buyback would offer. Mel stated a buyback is coming, so don’t expect it not too. It would be stupid. Would Liberty hinder company growth or appeciation of their stock holding? No, that would be “stupid”.

 

Disclosure: Long SIRI

0

Sirius XM Float Reduced by 200 Million Upon Lent Share Return

On October 19th, 2011, Sirius XM filed a 8K report stating that in October, Morgan Stanley returned the borrowed shares in the 2014 convertible bond offering, issued in 2008. These shares were mostly the reason the deal was considered "toxic debt", as their stated purpose would be to "hedge" a bond position. The shares were shorted and Sirius XM went from $2.70 a share in 2008 to .05 cents in 2009. Since then the stock has recovered to as high as $2.44 in 2011 but has been experiencing some rough trading as of late and now trades at $1.77 a share. This is now a non issue as Morgan Stanley no longer considers needing these shares to hedge. This could have been hindering forward movement of the stock. This could help stabalize the price as well as allow higher prices to be more achievable. This removes a major headwind on the mechanics of the stock trading. As for the fundamental model, it doesn't affect anything. Here is what the filing stated.

By Relmor Demitrius

On October 19th, 2011, Sirius XM filed a 8K report stating that in October, Morgan Stanley returned the borrowed shares in the 2014 convertible bond offering, issued in 2008. These shares were mostly the reason the deal was considered “toxic debt”, as their stated purpose would be to “hedge” a bond position. The shares were shorted and Sirius XM went from $2.70 a share in 2008 to .05 cents in 2009. Since then the stock has recovered to as high as $2.44 in 2011 but has been experiencing some rough trading as of late and now trades at $1.77 a share. This is now a non issue as Morgan Stanley no longer considers needing these shares to hedge. This could have been hindering forward movement of the stock. This could help stabalize the price as well as allow higher prices to be more achievable. This removes a major headwind on the mechanics of the stock trading. As for the fundamental model, it doesn’t affect anything. Here is what the filing stated.

“In October 2011, an aggregate of approximately 202,400,000 shares of our common stock were returned to us from Morgan Stanley Capital Services Inc. and UBS AG, which we retired upon receipt. After giving effect to the retirement of these shares, as of September 30, 2011, we would have had 3,749,546,009 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. This figure excludes shares of our common stock issuable upon the conversion of the preferred stock held by an affiliate of Liberty Media and other convertible securities and upon the exercise of warrants and stock options that are currently outstanding.
In August 2008, we loaned 262,400,000 shares of our common stock to Morgan Stanley and UBS to facilitate the offering of our 7% Exchangeable Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014. In July 2009, Morgan Stanley returned to us 60,000,000 shares of our common stock that were borrowed. These shares were also retired upon receipt.
We did not pay Morgan Stanley or UBS any consideration in connection with the return of the shares. Once borrowed shares are returned, they may not be reborrowed under the share lending agreements.
The shares loaned to Morgan Stanley and UBS were issued and outstanding for corporate law purposes. Under GAAP, the borrowed shares were not considered outstanding for the purpose of computing and reporting net income (loss) per common share. The retirement of these shares will have no effect on the calculation of our earnings per share. ”

 

These shares counted in the float, could be traded, and affected stock trading. Although they were not used in calculating earnings per share, this is a big piece of news for the company and another sign that times are changing.

You will hear from the peanut gallery many authors claiming they know why this happened. You will hear fancy words like reverse morris trusts and converting shares or refinancing debt. None of these things will probably happen and ignore the maddness.

The only thing that matters is they have been returned and 200 million shares that were circulating in the float are now gone.

Nothing bad about this and it is all good news.

This also increases our P/E ratio, as those shares were temporarily counted as outstanding shares.

This also removes 80 million shares from Liberty’s holding in outstanding for conversion of their 40% ownership.

In July of 2009, UBS had returned around 60 million of these shares already.  This final return closes out the entire amount lent.

So as you can see there are many reasons why this is a good thing going forward for the company. With a buyback coming in 2012, according to Mel Karmazin (CEO of Sirius XM Radio), the release of 2.0, and the upcoming new pricing tiers, 2012 should be an exciting year for investors and consumers of the product.

Disclosure: Long SIRI

www.kingofalltrades.comwww.radiowars.com

19

Sirius XM vs. HD Radio: The Battle For the Dashboard

Share

By Relmor Demitrius

     Sirius XM Radio (NASDAQ:SIRI) has many competitors.  Some are valid, some are fiction.  In this first installment of this article series discussing all Sirius XM competitors, I’d like to take a moment out of your day to try to find out which one of these HD radio falls into.  Even on Sirius XM SEC filings they list HD radio as a competitor.  So they are worth a look.  HD Radio after all was helpful in getting the merger approved, ironically.  Sirius XM simply used their own bullishness on the product against them to show how the struggling duopoly needed to be one company.  But is there any fact in the argument?   Let’s examine HD Radio closely to determine whether HD radio as a competitor for Sirius XM is a fact or a myth.

Here is what Sirius XM says on their own 10Q filing for Q2.

“our competitive position versus other forms of audio and video entertainment including terrestrial radio, HD radio,..”

HD (Hybrid Digital) Radio was introduced to the market in 2005.  The concept is to broadcast a digital signal from terrestrial repeaters imbedded in the existing analog signal.  The Radio station simultaneously creates a digital and analog audio broadcast where the digital signal is compressed and sent on to the repeater station.  The repeater stations then rebroadcast this signal to your home and cars.  The concept was to get a better signal around buildings and structures as well as add a clearer audio signal than normal terrestrial radio stations.  You can purchase HD radios over the counter from retail outlets like Amazon.com.  There is also some availability in the OEM car option as well, as some radios have HD capability built in.  There have been reported problems with this system however.

There are many consumer complaints about the product itself, some that even the company themselves, iBiquity Digital Corporation, has admitted too.  The first one is the antennae and reception.  They admit that consumers are upset with their antennas, side channels drop out, and adding an external antenna has done little to help.  Their solution on this issue was to simply to ask the FCC to allow them to broadcast EVERYTHING at a more powerful frequency.  This however does not solve other issues, nor has it been approved that I am aware of.  If passed would require huge spending to existing terrestrial radio stations to boost their power signals.  But that doesn’t solve the interference issue.

Consumers are also noticing interference when interpreting between the digital and analog signals.  Remember, its broadcasted together, in one stream.  Makes sense then doesn’t it.  Also the range on the HD signal is far weaker than the analog signal, frustrating consumers even more.  There is of course a purchase required to hear these stations at all, as no existing standard radio is capable.  So there is a cost also associated with the product.  Also keep in mind these stations still send commercials.  It is not commercial free.

Here is wording directly from WKSU in Ohio on these issues.

Can everyone in WKSU’s listening area hear the three HD.o channels?

“Unfortunately, no. In order to maximize the sound quality for both analog and digital listeners, the HD Radio signals are broadcast at a limited power level. The further away the HD Radio is from one of our towers, the more likely the HD Radio may drop out. Adjusting your antennae to its most-optimal position will also increase your ability to connect with a strong signal. Drop-outs primarily affect people listening to WKSU HD-2, HD-3, and HD-4; WKSU’s primary signal will automatically switch to an analog signal in an area where the digital signal is unavailable.”

They themselves are telling you the signal is weak and unreliable.  This was from September 2011.  One of the issues is a lack of power. The digital signals are limited to just one one-hundredth of the analog power of a radio station.   This would mean that in some cases, you need to be within a few miles of the source to pick up HD radio.  Not good.  For home and personal radio use, using smaller antennas, this problem is magnified. 

That’s all fine and good but what about the popularity of the product.  Google trends shows that hits from HD Radio topped out when it was introduced in 2005/6 and has been sharply down trending ever since.  Today, Ford Sync gets more hits than HD Radio combined. 

Google trends are cute and consumers will complain, but what about an icon in the audio entertainment industry.  What did Pioneer have to say about HD Radio in 2008?  This is in response to a standardized radio, the evolution of terrestrial radio evolving into an HD landscape.  Basically if consumers don’t want it, they can be forced to integrate the technology.  FCC is a fine partner for the NAB after all right?

“The iBiquity conditions would limit the breadth of radio product offerings to consumers, limit which radio component supplier’s products be designed into radio, have the effect of decreasing AM/FM tuning performance, unnecessarily increase costs to consumers uninterested in HD Radio, and interfere with the useful and healthy free-market mechanisms extant in radio electronics purchases.”

This next quote is from Gorman Media on their website, in regards to HD radio.

“38 percent of analog’s coverage area. If the digital power is increased to 10 percent, however, car radio coverage actually is better than analog, at 117 percent. For home and portable use, it increases to slightly more than 80 percent. However, increasing the power of digital broadcasts would cause substantial interference, decreasing analog coverage areas as much as 50 percent.  Stations you once heard may just disappear on your current radio.”

Even pro HD radio comments have no facts to support their claims.  They consider it a success but admit

they don’t even know how many use it.  Interesting. 

Ron Schott, chief engineer for WJBC(AM) in Bloomington, Ill., said the station has received no interference complaints — “to others, or ourselves” — since the station began broadcasting in AM HD in 2007.

“The HD experience for WJBC is hard to classify without a large base of (HD) receivers in the market,” Schott said

I consider (AM HD) a success. I think the improvement in sound quality is incredible,” said Brett Gilbert, director of engineering for the Clear Channel Tulsa cluster, which includes KTBZ(AM-HD) and KAKC(AM-HD).

“Unfortunately, I don’t know how many listeners we have that use HD radios.”

This station scrapped HD radio altogether. 

WKAR(AM) in East Lansing, Mich began HD Radio in 2005 but stopped in 2009, according to Harold Beer, chief engineer for WKAR.

“After years of encouraging listeners to get better quality wideband AM radios, we ended up degrading their listening experience with a 5 kHz bandwidth, –35 dB SNR analog signal once we turned on the IBOC digital,” Beer said.

“We also collected a number of negative comments due to the digital carrier, including complaints about the buzz that was always present, especially if a listener had an analog tuned radio that was slightly off-channel.” WKAR is a daytime directional AM operating on 870 kHz with 10 kW.

Sounds like they may have challenges but I keep reading about these deals they are getting with OEM car manufacturers to include their radios standard.  That’s fair.  Let’s do some digging around and see what’s available.  Proof is in the pudding right? 

The number 1 car sold in American is the Ford F-150.  Next is the Silverado.  We know Ford, GM, and Chrysler, as well as Toyota dominate the car market.  HD radio claims to have expanded  working agreement with these 7 automakers;  Ford, Hyundai, BMW, Lincoln, Volvo, Scion, and Kia.  So I would assume going to these car websites and calling these dealers would provide me with a wealth of information about the product and easy and quick information about the radios availability.  First let’s discuss the F-150 and Ford. 

A quick glance notices that it is never a factory installed option.  There is a system with a CD player on the FX 2 model called the “plus package” that comes with a Sony Radio system that has HD capabilities included in the AM/FM Sirius package already.  It’s one radio system that allows all these functionalities.  No separate option to install a straight HD Radio.  Most packages and options are not standard equipment on Ford even on the high end.  Nowhere on a Ford website can I see HD radio being advertised.  Sirius yes.  Let’s see what the dealers themselves have to say about HD Radio. 

Jeff Vien, sales manager at Sanderson Ford in Arizona was very helpful.  He stated there is “no individual option to add an HD Radio to any Ford right now.”  No factory installed option on HD Radio as well for Ford.  Only way to get HD radio is through the plus packages on the F150, America’s bestselling car.  I asked, do people ask for HD radio? 
“Not very often”.  Doesn’t sound like an “extended partnership” agreement to me. It took this manager many minutes to even know if and where HD radio was available were in Fords. It was not even close to first hand knowledge for this sales manager. But that’s just Ford.  Let’s check the number 1 car seller in America, GM. 

I called Bob Hug, a GM sales manager and asked him if there were any ways to get HD radio in their cars and trucks.  Simple answer here is no.  None.  I asked him, what would you tell a guy who asked for HD Radio?

Bob:  “I don’t know, no one has ever asked”.  Too funny.  Let’s see what Toyota has to say.

According to Bell Road Toyota in Phoenix, they do not supply any vehicles with HD Radio.  It’s not even an option to add.  I wonder if this makes Toyota lose customers.  So I asked Doreen Fischer, sales manager, does not having HD Radio cost you customers?

Doreen: “I have never lost a customer due to not having an HD Radio”.

Next is Chrysler.   Nothing.  Same story.  In fact, Mary from Chrysler Earnhardt had never even heard of HD Radio before.  Interesting.  A supposedly hot item that is competition I keep hearing about for satellite radio, and this sales manager of an auto dealer had never even heard of it.

Getting a bit disappointed I was sure to find support for HD radio in a known dealer with HD Radio.  After all, HD Radio themselves list Scion as a partner.  So I called Bell Scion and talked to a very nice gentleman in parts named Dusty Edmund, who also used to work in sales.  No Scion comes standard with HD Radio.  But the best part were his comments.

Dusty:  “I have never been trained in selling or distributing HD Radio as a product.  And I used to sell cars at many dealers, not just Scion or Toyota.”

Relmor: Do you think HD Radio is dying?

Dusty:  “ I thought it was dead.”   

What I found out was that if there is no motivation to make money selling HD Radio, no incentive to the dealer for selling an HD radio, and consumers of automobiles don’t seem to even want it.  I found this comment by an analyst regarding this subject to be spot on in what I found.

“HD radio is pretty much going to be nonexistent, because they can’t figure out how to get the auto guys to include that as an option, and the auto guys that do include HD don’t let the consumers know about it, “.  Ms. Ryvicker of Wachovia Capital Markets.

I must say I agree with that comment 100%.  With revenue sharing programs between Sirius XM and all major automakers, there is incentive other than making a consumer happy.  There is money in it for them as well.  This is what services like HD Radio and Pandora can never offer an automaker.  Sure you can use your hand off voice command to activate your music files and Pandora, but you can do that with your traffic, weather, and Sirius XM radio channels with Ford Synch and Dodges’ Uconnect as well. 

Conclusion:  HD Radio is a fading product that will soon be nonexistent or so unnoticeable from regular radio that it will have no long term effect on Sirius XM Radio.  In 6 years of HD Radio I’d say there has been no significant damage done.  Do I have any facts to support this?  Yes.  Subscriber totals from 2006 compared to subscriber totals from 2011.  Since HD Radio was introduced, has there been a linkable decline in subscriber growth?  You be the judge.  In 2005 Sirius and XM had a combined 9 million subscribers approximately.  Today they have over 21 million subscribers.  In the company’s first 5 years of operations they reached 9 million subs.  In 2011 they had 21 million.  So the last 5 years with HD Radio as a service, Sirius XM has seen their subscriber growth increase.  No effect.  Myth is shattered.

Next up: Sirius XM vs. Internet Radio

Disclosure:  Long SIRI

For up to date investor comments on all stocks and trades, visit www.kingofalltrades.com

www.radiowars.com

 

0

Radio Wars Movie Will Enlighten The New Generation

Share

By Relmor Demitrius

     Ever wonder how our media world arrived at where it is today?  Just how did TV, radio, and other media forces arrive in this current social structure?  Every wonder where technology will lead us?  Ever wonder what technology could actually kill a business?  In Radio Wars, directed by Sandra Mohr, you will get answers to all these questions and more.  Want to see the one movie no big media wants you to see?  Why would the traditional media be afraid of some of these subjects?  Radio Wars tackles these and other tough and compelling questions.  To know the future of media, first you must know and understand its past.

Here is one subject from the movie that is new and will attempt to answer where radio may be going and what the future holds. 

Terrestrial radio is losing money and becoming actually less consolidated recently.  They are desperate to save money in any ways they can.   Look no further.  One station in New Mexico is experimenting with a new cheap software he purchased to replace actual DJs.  http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/8/prweb8749405.htm  This virtual DJ can be programmed to give weather, news updates and even tell jokes.  All in a beautiful, sexy female voice.  She will be in the new movie “Radio Wars” for all to see.  Of course she still has to be inputted of course by humans.  But this now removes a job from someone who used to have one.  Two way communication in terrestrial radio may be ending.  Why did this particular radio manager do it?  He was honest.  To save money.  He didn’t sugar coat it.  This is a small sample of the information offered in Radio Wars about the past and future of radio and the media industry in general. 

What did Sirius XM have to endure to merge and survive?   What is the future of satellite radio as it collides with terrestrial radio going forward?  Are their similarities between the broadcast TV battle and what went on with cable TV? 

This is not some corporate movie paid for by anyone with big money.  This is honest people looking into the dark depths of a normally very shadowy behind the scenes industry.  There are more double dealings, crooked individuals, and political scandals to fill a text book.  Sandra Mohr, Director of Stock Shock, will delve much deeper into the radio industry than last time.  This time as a more documentary approach from the start.  This movie will have more interviews with closer ties to radio and media specifically.  Even the most knowledgeable radio people will get a benefit from watching this movie.  This is the” Roger and Me” of the 2010’s.  This movie will blow wide open long mysterious questions and shed light on exactly how we got here and where we are going, in media.

For more information please visit:  http://www.radio-wars.com/  and http://radiowars.com/.

Disclosure:  Long SIRI

6

Why Sirius XM’s Coming Price Increase Isn’t Really An Increase

Sirius XM Radio (NASDAQ:SIRI) agreed to voluntarily freeze their basic prices for 3 years following the merger in July of 2008.  Sirius told the FCC they would not raise prices on their base package.  In fact, Sirius XM has NEVER raised their prices, ONE PENNY, EVER.  Yes, that’s right.  100% factual statement.  Their base package price of $12.95 has been $12.95 since the year 2001.  No other company can hold that claim.  No cable company, phone company, satellite company, or any other pay subscriber service.  Raised nothing.  Not one dime.  Now it is time for loyal subscribers to pay finally for the improved reception, channels, availability and content.  I can’t think of a product were so much advanced value has been given for free for so long.  Well Sirius XM is finally going to have to ask its customers to begin paying it back the added value over the years without ever raising the price one cent.

By Relmor Demitrius -

Sirius XM Radio (NASDAQ:SIRI) agreed to voluntarily freeze their basic prices for 3 years following the merger in July of 2008.  Sirius told the FCC they would not raise prices on their base package.  In fact, Sirius XM has NEVER raised their prices, ONE PENNY, EVER.  Yes, that’s right.  100% factual statement.  Their base package price of $12.95 has been $12.95 since the year 2001.  No other company can hold that claim.  No cable company, phone company, satellite company, or any other pay subscriber service.  Raised nothing.  Not one dime.  Now it is time for loyal subscribers to pay finally for the improved reception, channels, availability and content.  I can’t think of a product were so much advanced value has been given for free for so long.  Well Sirius XM is finally going to have to ask its customers to begin paying it back the added value over the years without ever raising the price one cent.

Stockholders can finally rejoice.  No longer will content available in 2001 be the same charged for content available in 2011.  This is the real reason for the merger, in my opinion.  If not the main reason then it is close.  When Sirius and XM had to compete, it was impossible for one to raise rates without hurting itself.  Why?  Too similar of services with too similar of subscriber totals.

Forget inflation, just look at the differences in the companies from now till then.  This ultra-cheap service is about to up the media game a notch.  Finally real compensation for the best radio on the planet, period.  No close second.

  1. Howard Stern available on both services, mobile devices and internet.
  2. Howard Stern himself.
  3. Oprah Winfrey, NFL, NASCAR, College Basketball/Football/Hockey, MLB, NHL, CNBC, Bloomberg Radio, CNN, Opie and Anthony, Martha Stewart, British Soccer, Eminem, Jamie Foxx, and countless others.
  4. Countless news, sports and political talk shows never on before, including Glenn Beck.
  5. Better reception.
  6. Better Radios.
  7. Internet Option
  8. Wi Fi
  9. 2.0 Options coming (On demand, Replay, pause, on screen data, and more channels… possible Pandora like features as well..)

Now with the arrival soon of 2.0, there is even more reason to sign up and agree to pay the small increase on the basic package.

Here is what the new structure will look like.  Kingofalltrades.com discussed this scenario in length months ago on our radio show and used their own current structure on premium packages and common sense to arrive at this conclusion.

The basic rate of 12.95 will probably be increased to 14.99.  However, many customers will end up actually paying LESS not more.  Here is how.

They will announce a total package deal of $19.99 for everything.  That would include premium internet, Best of and all internet channels.  To buy all this separately right now would cost exactly $21.99. They are after the $20 subscriber business model.  Average rate per unit (ARPU) right now is only around $11.50.  They are trying to get this closer to $14 or $15.  This will help that greatly.  Also gone will be lifetime offers which has dramatically hurt ARPU.

Why would people do this?  Well they are paying it anyway.  Those who aren’t don’t like the difference between $12.95 and $21.99.  Well once its $15 instead of $13 they will think again about it.  Plus knocking some off the high end is in my mind more of a price decrease than anything.  Now the difference has gone from $12.95/$21.99, to $14.95/$19.99.  Now that looks much better to someone judging value.  Also, if price isn’t a huge issue anymore, who just buys the basic anything anymore?  Americans need the jumbo fries, the deluxe internet, and all the premium content.  Now that the price difference is dramatically closer, APRU should surge.  Also all new customers will see this difference and value and choose the $19.99 plan like the company wants them to do from day #1.  This will encourage upgrading.  So as you can see, if your adding internet and best of right now you would have to pay $22 a month.  So offering the whole thing at $20 a month would be actually lowering their prices.

But Relmor, that doesn’t make any sense.  If you are lowering your total price $2, how can you raise more money?  Because, it’s simple.  You are moving customers from 12.95 plan to the $20 plan, not the $15 plan.  Now they will just go for it all.  No point not too now.  It’s actually cheaper than it was before and you give customers a way to win without having to screw them.  So your top end payers will come down, but more bottom end payers will come up.  Hence more total revenue.  A lot more total revenue because every new subscriber from now on will have to pay at least the basic higher rate now.  And they will be more likely to take the higher package knowing how close it is to the lower base one.  If Sirius XM really wanted to make sure everyone upgraded their packages, they would raise the basic rate to $16.  That would ensure it for sure.

With the coming of 2.0 there will be a demand for cutting edge radios to go with the new service.  Great time to be a stockholder.  Price increase, new radios, new software upgrade, and finally a company not retrained by their own devices.  No competitor to hold them back on raising prices and no FCC to prevent them.

If old customers want to lock in the old rates, of course they can do that at any time.  Simply sign up for longer term plans now and pay ahead.  No big deal.  Anyone who wants to avoid the increase can.  It’s the new customers that will not have the option.

Notice I didn’t mention anything to do with any lawsuits in regards to this issue or the FCC allowing it.  I didn’t for a reason.  That is because there is absolutely nothing to prevent Sirius XM from now executing their plans.  Hence, it’s old news and not worth mentioning.    2.0 will be available for Christmas shoppers and the software upgrade will be out in January that will allow even more features to be available.

So all this talk over cancelling subscribers over a price increase is hog wash.  Fear mongers fomenting illogical assumptions.  In actuality, as I’ve shown here, there is no price increase.   Just a huge value increase.