SIRI Archive

4

Mel Karmazin and Greg Maffei Add Flavor to Sirius XM’s Future

Share

By Relmor Demitrius

 

     Yesterday CITI had a Global Entertainment and Media Conference, in which Mel Karmazin, CEO of Sirius XM Radio (NASDAQ:SIRI) and Greg Maffei, CEO of Liberty Media (NASDAQ:LINTA) spoke. There was no formal presentations by these gentleman but they were on board for answering some really good questions. This conference helped answer some important questions investors had about the company. Greg and Mel were very frank and offered valuable information investors can use to make better decisions about their investment with the company. First let us look at what Mel had to say. The first thing Mel offered was information on Q4 subscriber totals.

Mel stated that in Q4, Sirius XM added a net 540,000 additional subscribers. This beat yearly guidance by 100,000 subscribers. A decent beat but nothing to write home about. The great thing here is that Mel can once again be trusted, and when he upped subscriber guidance in 2011, it was to be accurate, and was surely no bullish pump. I know there were many media types that doubted the 1.6 million mark could be reached due to Japanese supply delays, production delays, and a higher churn base. However, these issues were overblown obviously and Sirius XM hit their mark and some. This is great news for investors and people looking for a reason to get in. Another issue with Mel not lying since the merger, is that he promised 2 radios for 2.0 in 2011 and delivered, by releasing the Lynx Hybrid Radio, for satellite use and internet, home or car.

This android based radio provides new features and functionalities, with an endless ability to upgrade its functionality and content. With new compressed bandwidth this radio opens up another avenue of content non 2.0 radios cannot receive. The biggest surprise on functionality came in another promise Mel made.

This news came during the CITI conference. Mel stated that “personalized radio”, like Pandora features, would be coming to their internet and smart phone services “probably this year”. He stated that it’s not a big deal for the company and wouldn’t be another business model, just another feature for retention. He stated if there are customers out there who would turn away from the product because they didn’t have this functionality, then Sirius XM was going to offer it to them. Basically Sirius XM can now evolve their radio experience to the demand of the consumer. The way he presented it was not like it was going to be a big revenue generator and basically implied it’s so easy to add, that the originality of the Pandora type service is easily reproduced. Pandora already has no uniqueness to begin with, as they compete with services like Slacker anyway. But I get what Mel is doing here. If this is an excuse by some, or even a perception that a service is demanded they cannot provide, then they will show you how easy it is to provide, and offer it at NO COST to exisitng subscribers. Free. Here you go subs. You wanted this cute random music generator tailored to your taste, here you go. Enjoy. Now Sirius XM 2.0 will have all the features everyone wanted and complained about. Let the new wave of bashing begin now. Maybe in a future article, since bears are running out of ideas, I can suggest some topics for them. Remember, on demand features have been mentioned and are coming as well. I expect some type of synergy down the road with Live Nation on this end. On Demand live concert events is one thought. Pay per listen. This would be yet another revenue stream. Maybe buying concert tickets from your radio too. Who knows.

Another topic broached was the new structure of the GM contract. The questioner wanted flavor on the details of the agreement. Mel stated he couldn’t say much, but he did offer some great insight we never knew before. He stated when they re-did the GM contract in 2009, there was an immediate impact. In fact, KOAT wrote an article at that time showing you from the filing directly how much was saved. So this is not new news to KOAT supporters. We have been gaining an advantage from the new structured GM deal since 2009. But as Mel explained it was 3 phase deal. More benefit comes to Sirius XM in 2013 and even more in the final phase in 2014. He stated the deal offers a “fairer return” that has “more appropriate value” for Sirius XM. He went over the philosophy of why the first GM deal was so advantageous for GM. Obviously to get your foot in the door it took some incentives. Now GM doesn’t want to be the only car maker without satellite radio in it. The new OEM deals will be, as Mel stated, “market value”. Meaning only one competing company now, based on real fundamentals that are mutually beneficial to both parties. XM never made $1 on the GM deal before the merger. All the benefit went to GM. Well in 2009 that changed, and in 2013 and 2014 coming it will become more like all the deals will be structured in the future. So synergies haven’t even barely begun on this aspect. Mel also mentioned another synergy investors can look forward too in the future.

Mel stated that cars have around a 10 to 14 year cycle. So when Sirius XM installed legacy radios that only can receive one signal, they are obligated to support that radio till it the car’s life is over. So if you begin installing 2.0 in 2013, you can guess the time frame it will take to phase out these old radios. Non 2.0 radios will never be sold again, at least not for Sirius’s signal. Sirius will not put out a new radio just for Sirius again, in my opinion. Although I don’t think that observation is a stretch. We know Sirius XM is trying to go to one platform and now we have Mel’s confirmation of that. He said by around 2020 you can expect the phasing to be near complete into all radios that can receive both signals. At that point the Sirius platform would be suspended and no new satellites will be launched that only send Sirius’s signal. That frees up half their bandwidth. Mel stated they can use it for different business model, more channels, or whatever they want. This is a huge synergy and one of the reasons the merger was so valueable. Now we have a time frame on all of this. What intrigued me the most as an investor is when he said “use it for a different business model”. That is another future revenue stream not priced into the stock one bit.

Mel also talked about how their margins are growing wider than first anticipated. They had modelled 30 to 35%, but now Mel is promising a 40% margin company in the near future. That is an amazing model for any business. I doubt oil companies even enjoy a margin like that. So basically if they earn 10 billion in revenue, there cash intake would be 4 billion dollars. That’s not earnings, its cash.

Earlier in the article Mel stated that subscribers grew by 540,000. He stated that at this time, the used car market is now adding “significant numbers” to the totals. This is the first time Mel has used the word significant here and judging by the Q4 adds, it is apparent it is finally making a difference. With recently adding the Auto Nation deal and already having the Car Max and all used cars sold by GM dealers in play, their base to catch the used car market is rapidly expanding. Since they convert these subs at a 35% or higher clip and these subs go directly to the self pay subscriber totals never being a paid promo, this will help grow their subscriber base substantially now into the future. Now let’s go over briefly what Greg Maffei had to say at the conference.

He stated that it was a very bad idea to “add the last shares” to gain control. This is not something they are necessarily looking to do. Gaining control of Sirius XM is not on the table apparently. He also stated anything they did in adding or whatever, would be something the board (Basically both sides) would agree too. There will be no hostile takeover or tender directly to shareholders basically. If the board agrees to something, they will explore that avenue. This is good news to investors. This means that both sides are finding some common ground and a common plan to benefit both sides, as I expected would be the case. Once again Maffei reiterated that the March date has little meaning to them.

Maffei also crushed the irresponsible and wrong argument perpetuated by the media rhetorics that the NOL’s are an attractive and motivational reason to acquire a controlling interest. He stated this answer once again, and appears bothered by the same dumb questions, that Sirius XM will use their own NOL’s. This has been a clear and consistant issue at KOAT since 2009. The only confusion on this issue has come from ignorant media types that take one bad piece of information and try to fabricate a story out of it. Sorry folks, no story here on that issue. Liberty is not sitting in a room plotting ways to destroy Sirius XM and their value. Hate to rain on your parade but the two sides appear lining up to agree on something here in 2012. It will be either how a return of preferred to Sirius XM would work, a buyback, or some type of mutually beneficial agreement to both sides. Of course the most logical thing is Liberty does nothing, holds at 40% and as stated by Liberty, “rides the growth path of Sirius XM”. So Liberty is not going to throw good money after free to gain control simply to do it. There would have to be a reason too. Maffei said it is too expensive to gain control at this point. Well when your first 40% is free, I can see their thinking on that.

He did state that if Liberty did take control, they WOULD NOT TENDER FOR THE COMPANY. They are NOT INTERESTED IN TOTAL 100% OWNERSHIP. There. Done, next. I am personally tired of this rumor myself. This one had made the very least sense. Basically if Liberty added it would be to around 50 to 60% and only if they felt the direction of the company was in danger. Of course this agreement to go to these levels could come as a concession on a number of issues, including how a buyback would work, restrictions on the preferred shares, or other give and takes. I also wouldn’t be surprised to learn that the fraud lawsuit currently going against Malone and the Sirius XM Board has taken some of the greed and bite out of Malone’s stances on working with Sirius XM on a mutually beneficial future plan. 2012 board decisions should be interesting so stay tuned.

As you can see by this conference that the company is strong and improving the cost and revenue side of the business. Mel has delivered a new radio that can evolve with demand and Liberty is set to ride the growth of Sirius XM Radio. 2012 should be full of new developments.

 

Disclosure: Long SIRI

0

Sirius XM’s Howard Stern Signs With America’s Got Talent

Share

 By Relmor Demitrius

   Just announced today is that Howard Stern will begin filming in February for being a judge on America’s Got Talent, a hit reality TV show in a talent show format. This is one of the most watched television shows in America.  The show airs on NBC.

This will be huge exposure for Sirius XM Radio (NASDAQ:SIRI), as their number one personality will now once again be a huge TV star. I think he will do an excellent job and is an excellent choice for the job. Exposure to the product will be greatly aided by this. This development should be interesting and can’t wait to see how Howard Stern does on his new job. Don’t worry about having time for both jobs, his gig at Sirius XM Radio is now only 3 days a week and he has plenty of off time. This was all announced on his radio show this morning.

 

Disclosure: Long SIRI

4

Look You Dumb Journalists, Liberty Is Not Acquiring Sirius XM, They Already Own It

Share

By Relmor Demitrius

 

    For the life of me I can’t understand why “journalists”, and I use that term extremely loosely here when considering the coverage of Sirius XM Radio (NASDAQ:SIRI), cannot understand simple math and simple facts. If I hear the NOL’s mentioned one more time as why Liberty would take over Sirius XM, I’m going to scream and throw something. NOL’s are 100% for Sirius XM to use, will be used 100% by Sirius XM, and has no value directly to Liberty. This is from comments from Frear (CFO of Sirius XM), Mel Karamazin (CEO of Sirius XM), and Greg Maffei (CEO of LCAPA).  There is NO SCENARIO PERIOD that allows Liberty to benefit from them except as an indirect 40% stakeholder in Sirius. It gives their holding more value, as profits are protected till around 2020. That’s it. That is the only benefit to the company and Liberty. LCAPA can’t spin off, spit off, crunch off, roll off, spit off, or any other form of off to make them any other way. So stop it. Stop it right now. Stop your incessant babbling and learn how to understand simple concepts. And they are not valued at 8 billion, its more, and its around 3 billion in cash value. NOT 8!!! There is no magic way to add 8 billion to the asset line. It comes in small chunks as savings on profits that would have been paid to IRS.

Another simple concept running out there that cannt seemingly be made clear is that Liberty doesn’t already control the company direction. As a 40% preffered stockholder with veto rights on major cash usage, they already control the company. They paid zero dollars for their stake and would be foolish to throw good money into it just to acquire a controlling stake. Reason they didn’t offer 50% in the first place. Reason prices .05 cents to $2.44 were ignored by Liberty to add to 49% , which they could have from day 1. Greg Maffei said it himself, stupids. Why would we acquire shares now, when we ignored them for so long? Exactly Greg. Common sense is in order.

Another stupid theory is that Liberty will tender for 100% of the company and take it private. Unbelieveable, unprecedented in how Liberty handles their assets, and also very stupid. Take on 100% of the risk versus 40% ownership with no risk? Who’s that stupid? Why pay another 8 billion dollars to buy out the company? You realize how long it would take them to cash out 8 billion dollars in Sirius XM with their current cash intake minus debt? Around 10 years at current levels. Or Liberty can stay 100% in profit range for 100% of the entire time they hold the company. What would you do?  Keep in mind Liberty owns 100% of very little.

Sure, Liberty could acquire a 10% stake if they don’t like how the board room is working out for their vision, but they are a hands off owner, so that is the least likely scenario out there. If they acquire a 60% stake you wouldn’t have to sell your shares, they would still trade and would be more valueable as more shares are out of the float. Tired of stupid authors not seeing this, mentioning this, or seeing the scenario it would require to produce this result.

Another stupid theory running around right now is that Sirius XM will miss their Q4 sub guidance. Obviously these people don’t know about production subs, the used car market success, or failed to become aware of declining losses in the retail side of the metric. Either way, they can’t do simple math. OEM adds for Q4 2011 will be around 600,000 minimum. Thats minimum. Now subtract maybe 100,000 retail side loss (typical every quarter) and you have your 500,000 subscriber addition quarter. Mel also stated they will meet guidance last time he talked. So saying a miss is coming makes for good clicks, but it doesn’t help you as an investor when an “expert” misses a simple math problem. Don’t forget, used car promo subs were never counted as a promo sub, hence will appear like magic directly to the self pay subscriber totals. These authors also fail to mention this fact.

Sirius XM buying Pandora is probably the funniest thing I have read lately. Talk about desperation as a Pandora stockholder. No, no one is going to buy your company. Sorry. You have no assets, hence nothing to value. I don’t see any acquisition out their more valueable right now that a buyback would offer. Mel stated a buyback is coming, so don’t expect it not too. It would be stupid. Would Liberty hinder company growth or appeciation of their stock holding? No, that would be “stupid”.

 

Disclosure: Long SIRI

1

2012 is a Year of Decisions for Sirius XM Radio

Share

By Relmor Demitrius

 

     According to Mel Karmazin, CEO of Sirius XM Radio (NASDAQ:SIRI), 2008 was “the merger year” for Sirius XM Radio and 2010 was the year of transitioning to profits and free cash flow growth. Then I say 2012 is the year of decisions. 2012 will hold vital decisions on the next few years and future of the companies structure and leadership. There are many important decisions coming from the Board of Directors and possibly Liberty Media (NASDAQ:LINTA). Last week we got a glipse into what that future might hold as Greg Maffei commented on such things at the UBS Global Media Conference on Monday Dec. 5th. This conference also had David Fear, CFO of Sirius XM, speak as well. Also Mel has been beating the drum on making a decision about his future as well, as his contract will expire in December of 2012. Postering is already beginning on that front as well.

In 2009 Mel Karmazin made comments about his future, as his contract was coming due at the end of the 2009. His current deal runs from 2010 to 2012. He stated then in 2009 he would not be second fiddle to anyone. He would rather do something else, suggesting a desire to start a fund himself. He stated maybe something new would be in order. This was of course postering and a warning to the board and the new 40% owners at the time, Liberty Media. He has now made the exact same comments in 2011. These comments came at a Reuters Media Conference from November. Basically with Mel Karmazin, its CEO and total control, or nothing with him. This is no new information to the board or Liberty.

Looking at the subscriber totals and improvements to the debt ratio and balance sheet since 2009, as the merger was his baby, I would have to say Mel was worth every penny and he has done an amazing job worthy of another 3 years. Was he perfect? No, but no one is of course. Has he made mistakes? Probably. Is he being sued for fraud by his own company? Yes he is, as is the entire board. This is from the handling of the Liberty Investment deal. This is an overhang on the board, but I don’t feel will be a factor in Mel and the boards decision.  As of right now, Mel has probably 7 board members minimum who are loyal to him and are from the company long term. I think Frear, himself, Amble, Black, Gilberti, Hartenstein, and Barry are locks to vote for Mel. Thats 7 of 13 board votes right there. There are another couple members that are independent additions that might favor a new direction, and then there are the 3 members from Liberty. Basically if Mel wants to come back, he should have the votes. If Liberty wants to go to a proxy situation and remove board members who would vote for Mel, then they have that right. I do not believe Liberty would go to such a drastic step to remove Mel. If they do not like the direction of the company, which they have stated time and time again that they do like the direction and are happy with their investement, then they might buy over 50% and just control it that way. If they feel management can no longer be trusted and the company must be more run “hands on”, which is not how they operate, then they might go that route. However since they are happy with the company, and are “riding the growth path of Sirius XM”, as stated at their Liberty Investment Conference slide show from this year, I expect no such course of action, at least for this purpose.

Mel has stated he wants clarity as to what Liberty’s intentions are with the future of the company. Are they going to allow a buyback? Or they going to allow preferred shares to be rebought? Are they going to take a controlling interest? If they do, what reassurances will Mel have that he will be in control? All these things are issues, in my opinion, to Mel re-signing with the company and why 2012 is a big year for decisions. I believe if Mel likes what he sees from the board and gets cooperation from Liberty on their future structure, stock options (buyback..etc..) and he gets the money and option packages he wants, then I am confidence Mel will be back for at least another couple of years. There is still much to transition with the company and the evolution and growth story of the company is no where near complete. If Mel set out to start and finish a job, he would be quiting at the half way point as I see it. I feel Mel sees this merged company now as his baby and he isn’t going to let it be raised by someone else without a fight. Management protection is a huge issue and Mel has a personal and financial interest in its success going forward. He owns 120 million stock options at around a 47 cent strike price and many more millions of actual shares himself. He re-signed with the company in July of 2009. Using this as a guideline, meaning I believe Mel will want to get a deal done before nearing the end of the year, I would expect heavy decision making and board meetings to occur in the first half of this year.

I think there are fights going on right now in the board room. I believe the Liberty is holding to a belief that a buyback of common shares will increase their percentage of ownership, as it is a static amount of shares due to them. They are protected from dilusion in the investment agreement. I believe negotiations for how or if a buyback would work hinge on the wording on this agreement and could ultimately come down to Liberty having to sue to see their interpretation enforced or they concede the issue. Sirius XM management can enact a buyback and not have it affect what is due percentage wise to Liberty Media, without permission from Liberty. Now if Liberty doesn’t want this, they might try to gain a controlling interest or seek legal avenues. Basically not only did they steal 40% of the company for a free, now they want to hinder future stockholder value by handcuffing their options on how a buyback would work. I guarantee this is what Malone is trying to get. They might however allow a buyback, if Sirius XM buys back an equal amount of corresponding preferred shares as well, thus keeping the percentage at 40%. This would reduce the float, but hold Liberty’s percentage as equal. But in order to reduce the float, Sirius XM would have to basically “double spend” to do it. They would also have to buy back whatever amount of preferred would keep it at a 40% stake. This would allow Liberty to pull money out without hurting their own ownership levels, while it benefits stockholders by reducing the amount of shares in the float. This situation wouldn’t be ideal for stockholders, but it would be better than nothing.  There are public comments from Mel and Malone and Maffei that seem to hint there are some hidden things going on that we don’t yet know about.  When Mel calls Malone “the Doctor” and laughs about it, you know something is up.  We will know soon enough.

Sirius XM is ok with a buyback just reducing total shares, and not affecting Liberty’s percentage. That is not what Liberty maybe trying to do here.  They may want a way to reduce the float while increasing Liberty’s percentage at the same time, which would nullify any value in a buyback, and not have to sell back preferred shares as well. Sirius XM would rather buy back preferred first of course, but if that answer is no, then Mel would go the other route, buying back common shares. Since Mel Karmazin has been touting a buyback since 2009 as a viable option in returning shareholder value, I believe this was and is still the working condition that Mel is going forward with. If Liberty wants to prevent this then they have the only option of going to court, or becoming a majority owner. In my opinion, preventing a buyback from occuring without keeping Liberty’s percentage the same removes all value to the buyback and why Mel and the board might be in talks to work this out to benefit both parties.  Both sides want the stock to appreciate and are on the same page on that. This is why I am hopeful an agreement can be reached and the company can move forward with the buyback plan, and re-sign their leader, Mel.

Another decison facing the company in 2012 is how to handle the upcoming debt situation. Mel can refinance out the 2013 13% bonds due to maybe 2018 with a new 6% interest rate. This would improve their interest payments immensely, while using no cash in the process. This allows cash to be used now on a buyback. They can also decide to take on new debt, roll out the bonds, and use money from that offering or cash on hand to begin a smaller scale buyback plan, being announced in 2012. Once this buyback plan is announced we will know what the situation is with how a buyback would affect Liberty’s percentage. I expect an annoucement in the first half of the year, probably in Q1 or Q2 conference call at the latest.

Although March is a date that allows a full investment into Sirius XM from Liberty Media, Greg Maffei at the Dec. 5th UBS Conference warned that this date really has no significance to them. If they were interested in a majority stake, he said then why didn’t Liberty add in the open market to 49% when the stock was trading at 15 cents in 2009. It would be illogical to add now basically when a cheap stock was ignored for so long. It has always been my contention that a free 40% stake is much more valueable than putting in good money to get to 50% or 60%. This gives risk now to a once risk free investment. Remember, Libertys cost average on their Sirius XM investment is zero. Its all 100% profit to them. Every dollar used to buy more exposes them to more risk. With practically control over big cash usage and happy with the day to day operations, this makes the least sense to me. Greg Maffei spelled out their options on Dec. 5th. He stated they basically have 2 choices.

1. Do nothing.

2. Add to take control. They could also do a spin off of course and some type of merger down the road as well. Any merger would require a 50% controlling stake first. He stated Liberty does 2 things usually with an investment. They either get out of it quick with a tax benefit, or hold long term. This is a hold long term situation with them.

Selling their stake, or converting and selling is not an option. Book it. It isn’t happening. They are not going to lower their percentage of control anytime soon. Maybe down the road if the stock gets over $5. Then a small scale out to book profits might be reasonable at that point. Maybe then they would sell their stake back to the company. Once maximum saturation of the market is achieved, I wouldn’t blame any investor for wanting to put the future risk of the company in someone else’s hands, especially when that investment was risk free to begin with.

The only way I see Liberty wanting control is if a decision on future use of cash cannot be reached with management, and they want full board control. In this scenario, Mel Karmazin would not be retained as CEO. I wouldn’t be surprised if Greg Maffei became the new CEO at that point.

So as you can see the company has a lot of things to resolve in 2012. It is going to be interesting to see how they handle debt, if Mel comes back ,and how they handle a buyback. A buyback Mel said would be a 2012 board decision. Keep in mind that their debt to leverage ratio will be at 2 to 1 by the end of 2012. They stated they want one of 3 to 1. Could this mean they take on debt to do a buyback? It is in the cards. Or it could be a partial use of debt, with some cash on hand as well. Only time will tell.

 

Disclosure: Long SIRI

1

Poor Journalism Creates Get Rich Quick Attitudes: One of the Causes for Sirius XM Price Drop

Share

By Relmor Demitrius

 

The truth is well hidden in a web of lies.  Best way to hide the truth is to present it daily, right in the open, and then mock it.  One of the worst things anyone can do when trying to figure out facts is to be bombarded with 100 opinions, half truths, and biased comments from amateurs who don’t care about you or their integrity as an author or analyst of a stock.  When Seeking Alpha began paying writers for articles depending on hits, Sirius XM (NASDAQ:SIRI) investors saw an explosion of articles on their company.  Other sites offered overcoverage too, like Motely Fool and Street.com.  This coverage came mostly from authors who had never covered the stock, or perhaps ever covered a stock at all.  From ex Disc Jockeys,  “Financial Genius’s” around every corner, to it even getting an author who promised to never write about Sirius XM again on Seeking alpha (declaring that the company changed titles and was loose with the editing) to come out of retirement to take advantage of the money Sirius XM investors and traders would create by clicking every nonesense article written.  In fact, based on my and other investors observation, the more manical, creative, and hogwashish the better.  It only increased your chances of being published the more contraversial article it was.  Basically the best chance for hits, the more likely it was published.  Not quality.  I proved that time and time again when I was denied publishing of excellent 100% fact based articles giving real information, while an article writing about how Sirius XM is doomed by Pandora using all opinions makes a double post that same day.  I even proved it to my members by writing an article with the word Pandora in the title and was published almost instantly after been turned down on previous article attempts.  It was hilarious.

Regardless of if you believe Sirius XM will succeed long term, so far bulls are more right than they even thought, the death of the truth and quality is startling.  As Seeking Alpha portrayed themselves to be an editor and selector of quality, this move created the worst coverage of a stock anyone has ever seen in investing history.  The amount of lies and misinformation pepetruated by these trash journalists was staggering and still continues today.  It is not SA responsibility to check every fact in these articles, but certain authors that constantly lied and gave misinformation were definitely favorites, so some judiciary duty was definitely possible here.  As retail investors flee the stock, good news for all Sirius XM holders, this will become less and less a factor, as less and less articles will be written.  We are beginning to see that now.  So if you love your stock, help it by not supporting these authors.  Make them disappear into irrelevancy that they are.

It can be hard to be a good trader when amateurs are buzzing in your ear.  From fear mongering to its “taking off” to the stratosphere swing comments from even sometimes the same authors, causes retailers to provide endless funds for the smart trader blocks.  Comments such as it’s taking off to $5 after hitting 2.44, to its never going back over $2 again.  This is the type of coverage and how effective it was, is possibly why certain investors or holders of the stock see no reason to not play the swing trade.  Huge money duping millions of dollars of Sirius XM money flow into buying too high, or selling too low.  It has been a massively profitable game for 3 years running.  Look at the percentage of volume and percenatge of moves this stocks makes even on a monthly basis.  Insane.  High beta, but high volume too.  Interesting.  Basically the more people play the stock badly, the longer it takes us to get out of the cellar.  If you can get a reet to sell at 2, buy at 2.20 and sell again at 1.45, wouldn’t you do it too?  Especially if the SEC and the Federal Government allow it and don’t care , as they have proven time and time again they do not.

Fail to Delivers in July may have helped cause this downturn, but the amout of misinformation circlating makes it impossible to make a good decision on a trade if you tend to listen to the chatter.  Too many get rich quick traders got punked back to reality and now the mess needs to be sifted through to get to higher prices again.  I’m not blaming Seeking Alpha for the downturn, but every bit helps.

Disclosure: Long SIRI